Dear Tony,
Dan urges me to try (to pretend) to be a good scientist ;-).
Haven't seen (or at least noticed) this either in Natrix natrix. Was it the same at the other side of the head? I'd guess, this is exceptional, but not necessarily due to genetics or anything similar. I believe that this kind of characters tends to follow a certain (in this case, of course, discrete and not continuous, because there cannot be e.g. 1,734 scales) frequency distribution, with the occurrence of a single scale being exceptional but not impossible at the one offshoot, and e.g. 4-6 scales at the high end. Often, these exceptions occur at only one side of the head or body.
This makes me think of some scale features of Iberolacerta lizards, in which e.g. presence or lack of contact between certain scales has been shown to occur at a certain percentage (e.g. 75% of specimens have those scales touching each other). This latter example shows a (larger) 1/4 chance of 'abnormality ', which is not a genetics thing, but a normal feature of the species' morphology. While this example is still discrete ("yes or no" = there's either contact or not), this also tends to be more of a continuous feature, if you regard the relative amount of contact between these scales (no contact, barely touching, large contact zone, ...).
Not really full-proof, but still thought I'd share my thoughts. Hope they're worth anything.
g's,
J. |